India's Nuclear Tests: The Consequences for International Security (Case Study #19)
(2000)
Dinshaw Mistry

DOWNLOAD FOR FREE, OR PURCHASE PRINT COPY.

India's nuclear tests of 1998 shattered a global norm against proliferation and posed a serious concern to the international community. Yet technically speaking, India faced no legal constraints to developing and testing nuclear weapons because it had not signed international treaties such as the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).

India rejected the NPT and kept open its nuclear option from the 1960s onward because it perceived security threats from China's nuclear program. Nevertheless, it refrained from formally declaring itself a nuclear power and enthusiastically supported a CTBT for several decades.

In 1996, however, India rejected the CTBT, arguing that the treaty was not conceived as a measure towards universal nuclear disarmament. It then conducted nuclear tests in 1998, after which Pakistan retaliated with its own nuclear tests. Nuclear testing in South Asia had ominous implications for international security: it signaled the formal emergence of two new nuclear powers and broke the global norm against proliferation and testing.

What effect did India's rejection of the NPT and CTBT and its subsequent nuclear tests have upon the cause of disarmament? Did India gain any national security benefits from its nuclear tests? And what steps can the international community and the nuclear states take to further nuclear disarmament?

About The Case Studies Series

Related

Resource Highlights

How will President Obama deal with the hopes and fears of people abroad? > More

David Speedie Interviews Gary Sick on the future of this troubled relationship. > More > All Videos

"Don't Super Size the IMF," by Kenneth Rogoff: Now is not the time to ramp up IMF lending on a long-term basis. > More

Go to the Journal for articles on ethics and foreign policy. > More