Carnegie Council Logo
 
SEARCH:  
   PEOPLE    ADVANCED
THEMES PROGRAMS CALENDAR RESOURCES SUPPORT US ABOUT US
Print Page Mail Page
 
Resources
  Transcripts
  Audio
  Video
  Ethics & International Affairs Journal
  Carnegie Ethics Online
  Articles, Papers, and Reports
  Other Publications
  Morgenthau Lectures (1981-Present)
  Human Rights Dialogue (1994-2005)
  Inprint Newsletter (2001-04)
  Case Studies Series (1989-2001)
  Nizer Lectures (1994-1998)
  Public Philosophy Monographs (1998)
  Privatization Project (1991-1994)
  Human Rights & Foreign Policy by Hans J. Morgenthau (1979)
  WORLDVIEW Magazine (1958-1985)
  For Educators and Students
  Global Ethics Corner Videos
  Resource Picks
  "To Be Read" Book Review Column
  RSS
 
 
Carnegie Council Podcast
Carnegie Council RSS


eNewsletter Signup
Please enter your email address to subscribe to the Carnegie Council email newsletter.
 
 
 
Most Emailed Pages
1. Business and Human Rights: Achievements and Prospects
2. Business and Human Rights in Conflict [Excerpt]
3. U.S.-Russia Relations: Under Stress, and in Need of Care
4. James Traub
5. Iran and the United States: David Speedie Interviews Gary Sick
 
   
     
 

Reconciling Internal Rights and External Wrongs: The Force of Arms and Ideas in War (Case Study #13)
(1991)
Greg Russell

 
     
 
Reconciling Internal Rights and External Wrongs: The Force of Arms and Ideas in War
Reconciling Internal Rights and External Wrongs: The Force of Arms and Ideas in War
$4.00 domestic
  Add to Shopping Cart
In this case study, the author confronts the question of "American purpose" in light of the Gulf War. Will the United States continue to be the world's policeman (occasionally under the auspices of the United Nations), and how will it determine what is a violation of its interests and what is not?

Also raised by Russell is the issue of what Americans deem worth killing and dying for. The term "new world order" is in fact a product of the Bush administration's ruminations and rationalizations about the war.

In answering the question "why we fight," the reasons given varied: oil, jobs, and the balance of power in a vital geopolitical area were tried first. These reasons were not nearly as well received as the need to stop aggression, stand against appeasement, enforce collective security, and keep humanitarian obligations to the ravaged Kuwaitis. It was these latter claims that lent themselves to the argument that we intervene because it is "moral, just, and right."


 
 

About The Case Studies Series

The Carnegie Council offers a series of twenty-two case studies for use in college and university classrooms. Each case presents and analyzes an historical example of an ethical dilemma in international affairs.

Related

Biography
Greg Russell
 
Keywords
Just War, Warfare
 
Region
Middle East
 
Countries
Iraq, Kuwait
 
 
 

Resource Highlights

Global Ethics Corner--Barack Obama: Hope and Change, but for Whom?
Global Ethics Corner
  How will President Obama deal with the hopes and fears of people abroad?
> More
Iran and the United States
Iranian Flag
  David Speedie Interviews Gary Sick on the future of this troubled relationship.
> More
> All Videos
New from Policy Innovations Online Magazine
Policy Innovations Online Magazine
  "Don't Super Size the IMF," by Kenneth Rogoff: Now is not the time to ramp up IMF lending on a long-term basis.
> More
Ethics & International Affairs
Ethics & International Affairs
  Go to the Journal for articles on ethics and foreign policy.
> More