Carnegie Council Logo
 
SEARCH:  
   PEOPLE    TOPICS
PROGRAMS EDUCATION CALENDAR RESOURCES SUPPORT ABOUT
Print Page Mail Page
 
Resources
  Transcripts
  Audio
  Video
  Ethics & International Affairs Journal
  Current
  Back Issues
  Carnegie Ethics Online
  Articles, Papers, and Reports
  Other Publications
  For Educators and Students
  Global Ethics Corner (Multimedia)
  Resource Picks
  RSS
 
 
Carnegie Council Podcast
Carnegie Council RSS
Twitter Follow us on Twitter


eNewsletter Signup
Please enter your email address to subscribe to the Carnegie Council email newsletter.
 
 
 
Most Emailed Pages
1. The Stolen Generation: Aboriginal Children In Australia
2. eNewsletter Signup
3. The Global War on Terror: A Narrative in Need of a Rewrite [Full Text]
4. Staff Writer
5. World Poverty and Human Rights [Full Text]
 
   
     
 

Whither the Responsibility to Protect? Humanitarian Intervention and the 2005 World Summit [Abstract]
Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 20.2 (Summer 2006)
Alex J. Bellamy

 
     
 

July 28, 2006

At the 2005 World Summit, the world’s leaders committed themselves to the "responsibility to protect", recognizing both that all states have a responsibility to protect their citizens from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity and that the UN should help states to discharge this responsibility using either peaceful means or enforcement action. This declaration ostensibly marks an important milestone in the relationship between sovereignty and human rights but its critics argue that it will make little difference in practice to the world’s most threatened people.

The purpose of this article is to ask how consensus was reached on the responsibility to protect, given continuing hostility to humanitarian intervention expressed by many (if not most) of the world’s states and whether the consensus will contribute to avoiding future Kosovos (cases where the Security Council is deadlocked in the face of a humanitarian crises) and future Rwandas (cases where states lack the political will to intervene). It suggests that four key factors contributed to the consensus: pressure from proponents of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, its adoption by Kofi Annan and the UN’s High Level Panel, an emerging consensus in the African Union, and the American position. Whilst these four factors contributed to consensus, each altered the meaning of the responsibility to protect in important ways, creating a doctrine that many states can sign up to but that does little to prevent future Kosovos and Rwandas and may actually inhibit attempts to build a consensus around intervention in future cases.

To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.



 
 

About the Journal

The Carnegie Council's flagship publication, Ethics & International Affairs is an interdisciplinary resource for scholars, students, and policy analysts concerned with the moral dimensions of global issues. The journal covers global justice, civil society, democratization, international law, intervention, sanctions, and related topics.

SUBSCRIPTIONS
To subscribe to Ethics & International Affairs, or to purchase individual issues and articles, go to Wiley-Blackwell.

SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
For submission guidelines, click here.

RESPONSES
The Editors welcome responses to Features and Essays published in Ethics & International Affairs. To be considered for publication, responses should be no longer than one thousand words, including endnotes (which should be kept to a minimum). Responses are not peer-reviewed, and are published at the Editors' discretion. All responses are subject to editing for length and style. In the event of any questions or substantive editing, the response will be returned to the author for final approval prior to publication. Responses are published online, alongside the article they address.

Related

Biography
Alex J. Bellamy
 
Keywords
Human Rights, Intervention, Genocide, Transitional Justice
 
Topic
Humanitarian Intervention
 
 
 

Features

Policy Innovations Online Magazine
Policy Innovations Online Magazine
  The central address for a fairer globalization.
> More
Global Ethics Corner Videos
Global Ethics Corner
  Weekly 90-second videos on newsworthy ethical issues.
> More
Ethics & International Affairs
Ethics & International Affairs
  Go to the Journal for articles on ethics and foreign policy.
> More