SEARCH: PEOPLE TOPICS

Resources

Transcripts

Audio

Video

Ethics & International Affairs Journal

	Current
	Back Issues

Carnegie Ethics Online

Articles, Papers, and Reports

Other Publications

For Educators and Students

Global Ethics Corner (Multimedia)

Resource Picks

RSS

	Carnegie Council Podcast
	Carnegie Council RSS
	Follow us on Twitter

Most Emailed Pages

1.	The Stolen Generation: Aboriginal Children In Australia
2.	eNewsletter Signup
3.	The Global War on Terror: A Narrative in Need of a Rewrite [Full Text]
4.	Staff Writer
5.	Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa

Global Warming: More Common Than Tragic [Abstract]
Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 18.1 (Winter 2004)
Elizabeth R. DeSombre

February 3, 2004

Global warming is indeed a difficult international environmental problem to address: it has tragedy of the commons characteristics, and problems of time horizons and uncertainty. But previous efforts at international cooperation on other environmental issues such as ozone depletion suggest that international cooperation should be possible—though difficult—on climate change. Cooperation on issues that involve long time horizons suggests that the present generation is not calculating utility quite so narrowly as game theorists posit. Experience also suggests that successful cooperation on climate change will start with measures so small as to seem inconsequential, but will set in place an institutional and scientific process that will ultimately result in much more significant cooperative efforts. Rather than representing a tragedy, the Kyoto Protocol (or something much like it) could represent the beginnings of a process in which current generations take the first steps at collective action that dramatically improve the lives of future generations. Those who are concerned about the weakness of the Kyoto Protocol should first focus on persuading the United States to join—since this is the best way to let the process work and avoid a tragedy of the commons.

To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.

Related Resources:

The Global Warming Tragedy and the Dangerous Illusion of the Kyoto Protocol [Abstract] (Articles)

About the Journal

The Carnegie Council's flagship publication, Ethics & International Affairs is an interdisciplinary resource for scholars, students, and policy analysts concerned with the moral dimensions of global issues. The journal covers global justice, civil society, democratization, international law, intervention, sanctions, and related topics.

SUBSCRIPTIONS
To subscribe to Ethics & International Affairs, or to purchase individual issues and articles, go to Wiley-Blackwell.

SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
For submission guidelines, click here.

RESPONSES
The Editors welcome responses to Features and Essays published in Ethics & International Affairs. To be considered for publication, responses should be no longer than one thousand words, including endnotes (which should be kept to a minimum). Responses are not peer-reviewed, and are published at the Editors' discretion. All responses are subject to editing for length and style. In the event of any questions or substantive editing, the response will be returned to the author for final approval prior to publication. Responses are published online, alongside the article they address.