Home > Resources > Ethics & International Affairs Journal (quarterly) > Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 17.1 (Spring 2003) > Debate: Israel's Policy of Targeted Killing
Israel's Policy of Targeted Killing [Abstract]
Ethics and International Affairs, Volume 17.1 (Spring 2003)
Steven R. David
March 2, 2003
Since the beginning of the second intifada in the fall of 2000, Israel has
pursued a policy in which alleged Palestinian terrorists have been hunted down
and killed by government order. The policy is not one of assassination and is
consistent with international law because Israel is engaged in armed conflict
with terrorists, those targeted are usually killed by conventional military
means, not through deception, and the targets of the attacks are not civilians
but combatants or are part of a military chain of command. Targeted killing has
also been affirmed by Israel’s High Court.
Although targeted killing has been pursued by Israel throughout its history,
the scale of the present effort and the use of sophisticated military assets
such as helicopter gunships and jet fighters set it apart from earlier
practices. The effectiveness of the policy is called into doubt because it has
not prevented––and may have contributed to––record numbers of Israeli civilians
being killed. The policy has also resulted in informers being revealed,
intelligence resources diverted, potential negotiating partners eliminated. It
has also produced murderous retaliation and international condemnation of
Israel. Benefits of the policy include impeding the effectiveness of terrorist
operations, keeping terrorists on the run, and deterring some attacks. In
addition, it affords the Israeli public a sense of revenge and retribution.
Because it targets the actual perpetrators of terrorism, targeted killing
provides a proportionate and discriminate response to the threat Israel faces.
Improving the policy will require better civilian oversight, greater care to
eliminate harm to innocent bystanders, and refraining from killing political
leaders. Despite its many shortcomings, Israel is justified in pursuing this
policy so long as it faces a terrorist threat that the Palestinian Authority
will not or cannot control.
To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.
About the Journal
The Carnegie Council's flagship publication, Ethics & International Affairs is an interdisciplinary resource for scholars, students, and policy analysts concerned with the moral dimensions of global issues. The journal covers global justice, civil society, democratization, international law, intervention, sanctions, and related topics.
Search the Journal
Sign up for the EIA Journal Newsletter
SUBSCRIPTIONS
To subscribe to Ethics & International Affairs, or to purchase individual issues and articles, go to Wiley-Blackwell.
CALL FOR PAPERS
We are currently accepting submissions for upcoming issues of the journal. For more information, click here.
SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
For submission guidelines, click here.
RESPONSES
The Editors welcome responses to Features and Essays published in Ethics & International
Affairs. To be considered for publication, responses should be no longer than one
thousand words, including endnotes (which
should be kept to a minimum). Responses
are not peer-reviewed, and are published at
the Editors' discretion. All responses are
subject to editing for length and style. In the
event of any questions or substantive editing,
the response will be returned to the author
for final approval prior to publication.
Responses are published online, alongside
the article they address.

Related
By Any Name Illegal and Immoral: Response to "Israel's Policy of Targeted Killing"[Abstract]
If Not Combatants, Certainly Not Civilians [Abstract]
Steven R. David
Terrorism,
Intervention,
Just War,
Human Rights,
Warfare,
Security
Israel
Most Emailed Pages