|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
Carnegie Council Podcast |
 |
Carnegie Council RSS |
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Home > Resources > Ethics & International Affairs Journal > Volume 15.1 (Spring 2001) > Articles |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Achieving Democracy [Abstract]
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
May 4, 2001
Overcoming corruption and authoritarian government in developing countries is
hampered by global institutional arrangements. In particular, international
borrowing and resource privileges, which entitle those exercising power in a
country to borrow in its name and to effect legally valid transfers of ownership
rights in its resources, can be obstacles to achieving democracy. These
international conventions greatly increase the incentives toward attempts at
coups d'état, especially in countries with a large resource sector. In exploring
how this problem might be highlighted and addressed, it is essential to
understand that affluent societies have a great interest in upholding the
prevailing institutional arrangements: Their banks benefit from their
international lending and, far more importantly, their firms and people benefit
greatly from cheap resource supplies. Institutional reform is more likely, then,
to come from the developing countries. Thus, fledgling democracies may be able
to improve their stability through constitutional amendments that bar future
unconstitutional governments from borrowing in the country's name and from
conferring ownership rights in its public property. Such amendments would render
insecure the claims of those who lend to, or buy from, dictators, thus reducing
the rewards of coups d'état. This strategy might be resisted by the more
affluent societies, but such resistance could perhaps be overcome if many
developing countries pursued the proposed strategy together, and if some moral
support emerged among the citizenries of affluent societies.
To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Carnegie Council's flagship publication, Ethics & International Affairs is an interdisciplinary resource for scholars, students, and policy analysts concerned with the moral dimensions of global issues. The journal covers global justice, civil society, democratization, international law, intervention, sanctions, and related topics.
SUBSCRIPTIONS To subscribe to Ethics & International Affairs, or to purchase individual issues and articles, go to Wiley-Blackwell.
RESPONSES
The Editors welcome responses to Features and Essays published in Ethics & International
Affairs. To be considered for publication, responses should be no longer than one
thousand words, including endnotes (which
should be kept to a minimum). Responses
are not peer-reviewed, and are published at
the Editors' discretion. All responses are
subject to editing for length and style. In the
event of any questions or substantive editing,
the response will be returned to the author
for final approval prior to publication.
Responses are published online, alongside
the article they address.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Will people associate U.S. power with "global misery" or with the opportunity and pluralism that Obama's victory represents?
> More
|
|
|
|
Devin Stewart interviews Seth Kaplan on his new book, which lays out a new paradigm for development.
> More
> All Audios
|
|
|
|
"Corporate Social License and Community Consent," by Keith Slack.
> More
|
|
|
|
Go to the Journal for articles on ethics and foreign policy.
> More
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|