Carnegie Council

People Topics

Text Size: A A

A Response [Abstract]

Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 11 (1997)

Michael Walzer

December 4, 1997

Michael Walzer

Responding to the critiques of the four previous authors, Walzer opens with a statement of the inherent imperfection of any theory of war. He reminds us that theories are merely frameworks for decisions and cannot provide answers in and of themselves. Moral decisions in war are especially difficult, for it is often necessary to choose between equally valid claims. Walzer continues the discussion of sieges initiated by both Koontz and Boyle and concedes the validity of Koontz's criticism of inconsistency in his theory of noncombatant immunity. Addressing the different authors' moral doctrines—Hendrickson's consequentialism and Koontz's and Boyle's deontology—Walzer argues that it is better to judge each case individually, weighing both the consequences and principles, rather than strictly adhere to one moral doctrine, an approach commended by Smith. Finally, in the search for a perfect just war theory, Walzer issues a realist reminder that there can be no such thing as a morally perfect war.

To read or purchase the full text of this article, click here.

Related Resources:

Just and Unjust Wars: Casuistry and the Boundaries of the Moral World [Abstract] (Special Section: Twenty Years of Michael Walzer's Just and Unjust Wars)
Noncombatant Immunity in Michael Walzer's Just and Unjust Wars [Abstract] (Special Section: Twenty Years of Michael Walzer's Just and Unjust Wars)
In Defense of Realism: A Commentary on Just and Unjust Wars [Abstract] (Special Section: Twenty Years of Michael Walzer's Just and Unjust Wars)
Growing Up With Just and Unjust Wars: An Appreciation [Abstract] (Special Section: Twenty Years of Michael Walzer's Just and Unjust Wars)
Arguing About War (2006) (Transcript)
Arguing about War (2004) (Transcript)
The New Killing Fields: Massacre and the Politics of Intervention (Transcript)
Universalism and Jewish Values (Transcript)

About the Journal

The Carnegie Council's flagship publication, Ethics & International Affairs is an interdisciplinary resource for scholars, students, and policy analysts concerned with the moral dimensions of global issues. The journal covers global justice, civil society, democratization, international law, intervention, sanctions, and related topics.

Search the Journal

SUBSCRIPTIONS
To subscribe to Ethics & International Affairs, or to purchase individual issues and articles, go to Wiley-Blackwell.

CALL FOR PAPERS
We are currently accepting submissions for upcoming issues of the journal. For more information, click here.

SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
For submission guidelines, click here.

RESPONSES
The Editors welcome responses to Features and Essays published in Ethics & International Affairs. To be considered for publication, responses should be no longer than one thousand words, including endnotes (which should be kept to a minimum). Responses are not peer-reviewed, and are published at the Editors' discretion. All responses are subject to editing for length and style. In the event of any questions or substantive editing, the response will be returned to the author for final approval prior to publication. Responses are published online, alongside the article they address.