Carnegie Council

SEARCH:

People Topics

Text Size: A A

Print this Page Email this Page Bookmark and Share

Democracy and Waging War

Friday, December 4, 2009

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Right-click here to download.

Having trouble with audio or video playback? Click here


Post a comment below.

Can a democracy effectively engage in long-term foreign policy or in war?

Perhaps this was true when voting was limited and aristocrats ran governments. In 1848 in Britain, Lord Palmerston said, "We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual..."

Today, social science research suggests a fickle public.

The book, Democracies at War, demonstrates that in a difficult and protracted war a democracy may give in or accept a draw because of the public. Berinsky shows that elite conflict over defense policy, rather than mere casualties, determine the public's support for war.

These ideas are contradicted by the consistency of America's Cold War policy, however, here U.S. existence was threatened by the Soviet Union. President Bush made the "war on terror" a similar existential threat, recognizing short-term public support.

Hence, politicians may have only three choices.

They can govern incrementally, bow to limited public attention on international issues, craft policies that don't risk a minimum consensus, and hope that long-term issues can be held at bay.

Or, politicians can govern for tomorrow, take bold positions, lead, risk abandonment by the electorate, and court failure.

Or, they can walk the line, mediating between short-term expediency and unreachable vision, trying to educate, while not alienating, the public. This is the art of politics, and involves risks in both directions.

Which risk would you choose? Short-term expediency or failure by over-reaching?

By William Vocke

For more information, see:

Bernisky, Adam J., "Assuming the costs of War: Events, Elites, and American Public Support for Military Conflict," Journal of Politics 69, issue 4 (2007)

Lord Palmerston, Speech to the House of Commons, Hansard (March 1, 1848)

Reiter, Dan and Allan C. Stam, Democracies at War (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 2002)

Related Resources:

blog comments powered by Disqus

About Global Ethics Corner

Created, edited, and produced by Carnegie Council Senior Program Director and Senior Fellow William Vocke, Global Ethics Corner is a weekly 90-second to two-minute segment devoted to newsworthy ethical issues.

YouTubeWe welcome your thoughts on these videos! Go to our Global Ethics Network page on YouTube to post a comment or a video.

To search our resources by topic, keyword, author, country etc., click on TOPICS at the top of this page.

Carnegie Council Merchandise

Carnegie Council Merchandise Support the Council! Visit the Carnegie Council store at CaféPress.com and shop for Council-branded merchandise (external site).

Related

Audio
Global Ethics Corner: Democracy and Waging War

Keywords
Democracy, Ethics, Warfare

Topics
Armed Conflict
Ethics
International Relations

Features

Policy Innovations Online Magazine

The central address for a fairer globalization.
> More

blue dot separator

Global Ethics Corner Videos

Weekly 90-second videos on newsworthy ethical issues.
> More

Ethics & International Affairs

Go to the Journal for articles on ethics and foreign policy.
> More